Faulkner and his plots
I am still waiting to receive my textbook from the Pony Express. Having said that, I can tell what I think of Faulkner's style of "plotting" from what I read in A Rose for Emily. Faulkner uses a method that engages the reader without taking them on a chronological ride though Emily's life. Staring with her death to ending with her death, Emily is portrayed through a series of events that paint a picture of her and how the town sees her. This story proves that to have a great piece of literature, the ingredient of chronological timetables isn't always necessary and can, in fact, make for a remarkable story that enthralling the readers.
http://www.public.coe.edu/~theller/essays/rose.html
http://www.public.coe.edu/~theller/essays/rose.html
I agree with your post, my personal preference is that this plot was hard to follow, but that does not mean that it was a bad story! Just to confusing for my liking.
ReplyDeleteI myself like how the timetable jumps back and forth. Had the funeral been the end of the story though it wouldn't have made much sense. I feel like the back and forth distracts you from the weirdness of the character and lets Homers discover at the end be that much more shocking.
ReplyDelete